-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: optimize heartbeat process with concurrent runner - part 2 #8052
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
de81774
to
16e1028
Compare
16e1028
to
bb00939
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8052 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.29% 77.34% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 470 470
Lines 61143 61225 +82
==========================================
+ Hits 47260 47355 +95
+ Misses 10320 10309 -11
+ Partials 3563 3561 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Signed-off-by: nolouch <[email protected]>
bb00939
to
ef1bc25
Compare
collectFromItemSlice(r.leaders, storeID) | ||
collectFromItemSlice(r.followers, storeID) | ||
collectFromItemSlice(r.learners, storeID) | ||
collectFromItemSlice(r.witnesses, storeID) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a possibility that the following situation exists: I detected an overlap in the leaders tree and added item.RegionInfo
, then, before I check other role trees, something like a leader transfer occurs. Will I not be able to get the latest item.RegionInfo
because of this? Will there be any side effects?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here checks hold the lock, which means the new changes have not updated the subtree yet. So I think it's ok, then will handle the new updates.
Signed-off-by: nolouch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: nolouch <[email protected]>
/merge |
@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: f67c8a8
|
@nolouch: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
) ref tikv#7897 Optimize heartbeat process - Split the statics updates on the subtree Signed-off-by: nolouch <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Ref #7897
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Before:
After:
The duration of the pending state on tikvs has been reduced from 10 minutes to 3 minutes
Release note